<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New York Times reader out for Mac, still a bad idea</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hackerjournalist.net/2008/05/22/new-york-times-reader-out-for-mac-still-a-bad-idea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hackerjournalist.net/2008/05/22/new-york-times-reader-out-for-mac-still-a-bad-idea/</link>
	<description>Like a photo journalist, but with a laptop</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 20:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brian Boyer</title>
		<link>http://hackerjournalist.net/2008/05/22/new-york-times-reader-out-for-mac-still-a-bad-idea/comment-page-1/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Boyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 15:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixthw.com/?p=77#comment-28</guid>
		<description>You're right.  I was oversimplifying to suggest they were clones.  They're very different.  And they have different goals.

The web has changed how software is delivered.  The most cutting-edge applications today are online.  All you need is a browser.

Silverlight is Microsoft's reaction to the web.  Applications built in HTML and Flash threaten their dominance as a platform.

If I had any advice for Microsoft, it would be this: embrace the new ecosystem.  Compete by building better software, not by creating a new platform.

Also:  I don't believe in the necessity of online/offline applications.  They're a very, very expensive stopgap.  We're moments from being online, all the time.  If Gmail/Hotmail/Yahoo Mail can tell us anything, it's that most people don't need offline portability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right.  I was oversimplifying to suggest they were clones.  They&#8217;re very different.  And they have different goals.</p>
<p>The web has changed how software is delivered.  The most cutting-edge applications today are online.  All you need is a browser.</p>
<p>Silverlight is Microsoft&#8217;s reaction to the web.  Applications built in HTML and Flash threaten their dominance as a platform.</p>
<p>If I had any advice for Microsoft, it would be this: embrace the new ecosystem.  Compete by building better software, not by creating a new platform.</p>
<p>Also:  I don&#8217;t believe in the necessity of online/offline applications.  They&#8217;re a very, very expensive stopgap.  We&#8217;re moments from being online, all the time.  If Gmail/Hotmail/Yahoo Mail can tell us anything, it&#8217;s that most people don&#8217;t need offline portability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad King</title>
		<link>http://hackerjournalist.net/2008/05/22/new-york-times-reader-out-for-mac-still-a-bad-idea/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 12:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixthw.com/?p=77#comment-29</guid>
		<description>I don't think it's accurate to describe Silverlight -- and it's MUCH cooler cousin AIR -- as Flash clones.

The two allow for a great deal of online-offline flexibility which Flash absolutely can't do. The underlying architectures are different.

That said: I had a chance to talk with the MS folks in Austin and you are right that choosing MS over Adobe will likely prove to be a bad choice. If you haven't tried out AIR applications, I suggest it because you'll see very quickly what the new app offers that Flash doesn't.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s accurate to describe Silverlight &#8212; and it&#8217;s MUCH cooler cousin AIR &#8212; as Flash clones.</p>
<p>The two allow for a great deal of online-offline flexibility which Flash absolutely can&#8217;t do. The underlying architectures are different.</p>
<p>That said: I had a chance to talk with the MS folks in Austin and you are right that choosing MS over Adobe will likely prove to be a bad choice. If you haven&#8217;t tried out AIR applications, I suggest it because you&#8217;ll see very quickly what the new app offers that Flash doesn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
