I recently started studying journalism after having worked in web design and development for around five years. I was recently asked to give my perspective on journalism after my first 5 months of class.
One thing I’ve discovered through talking to people, including teachers and others in education, is that the Internet is encouraging more people to contribute.
Well, obviously, right?
I think we are just starting to learn how to contribute. People are all writing and reading so much more than they used to. And the youngest generation today is growing up submerged in interactive culture. I grew up watching television, as did my parents. My grandparents grew up listening to the radio. Kids are growing up today with full duplex mass media (it goes both ways). So in the discussion about citizen journalism, I think the citizenry is just beginning to learn the skills to they need to contribute.
I joke that I made a dumb career decision in going from IT to journalism. High pay and low stress to low pay and high stress. Journalism is hard. My goal as a programmer was to get the computer to do my job and make money, even if I’m not around. As a journalist I’ll be trading words for dollars. If I don’t write words, I don’t get dollars.
So I guess the goal here is to figure out how to get the computer to do my new job.
It’s really interesting to be on the creation side of IT. I’ve always been intrigued by content creation software and enjoyed dabbling in it, but it’s great to actually have a good reason and a good idea to make use of all the great tools out there. It’s been an interesting experience to be on both sides.
There are a lot of great tools out there already that make a journalist’s job easier, and this is making journalism more accessible for those who might consider doing it casually.
But like the citizens, the technology still has a way to go.
I can’t imagine reporting before the Internet, and kudos to those that did it. But beyond just information gathering that the web and the Google make so easy, data processing should get better at connecting us with sources. And pointing us in the direction of a good story.
For example, take Public Insight Journalism. I first heard about this at the symposium on Computation + Journalism at Georgia Tech in February. The system was designed and is in use at Minnesota Public Radio, and it could almost be called a contact relationship management system built for journalists. It is a massive network of citizens who can participate by being sources or by submitting story ideas. Twitter is fine, but this is the kind of software we should be building.
And as far as the citizens go, journalism should be taught in high school. And it should be mandatory. It shouldn’t just be considered a special skill, it should be considered basic citizenship.
Ryan Mark is also a programmer, journalist and Medill graduate student. He blogs regularly about digital divide issues at Digital Divisions.
Hey Brian!
So, what do you think is harder? The technology problems or the societal shortcomings? As much as journalism sounds like a good idea in high school, I feel like there are basic problems that schools need to focus on first so more students can participate… Maybe it’s bad for me to ask which problem is ‘worse’ and instead look for common solutions?
I wonder how new technologies are going to come into play… better voice recognition, video recognition/search, wimax, cloud computing – just a few things that come to mind.
and… IT is high pay and low stress??? I’m not so sure about the low stress… 😉
Even with/without all the bells and whistles, I guess a good story is still a good story. And finding people who care about that seems to get easier everyday!