Here Comes Everybody: the Internet as a catalyst for social change

So, I’m not quite finished with Clay Shirky’s new book, Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing Without Organizations, but it’s too good to hold off posting. His take on the state of the newspaper is especially great:

We’ve long regarded the newspaper as a sensible object because it has been such a stable one, but there isn’t any logical connection among its many elements: stories from Iraq, box scores from the baseball games, and ads for everything from shoes to real estate all exist side by side in an idiosyncratic bundle. What holds a newspaper together is primarily the cost of paper, ink, and distribution; a newspaper is whatever group of printed items a publisher can bundle together and deliver profitably. The corollary is also true: what doesn’t go into a newspaper is whatever is too expensive to print and deliver. The old bargain of the newspaper — world news lumped in with horoscopes and ads from the pizza parlor — has now ended. The future presented by the internet is the mass amateurization of publishing and a switch from “Why publish this?” to “Why not?”

Here Comes Everybody

Newspapers stopped making sense when the cost of publishing disappeared. They no longer own the written word. It’s been given to everybody. Pulp used to be the most effective way to spread the word — this is no longer true.

And that’s just the tip of the iceberg. Shirky’s take on the transformative power of social software is spot on. It’s an excellent, fast-reading, example-packed companion to Yochai Benkler’s incredible, though slightly chewier, book The Wealth of Networks.

Highly recommended.

Wired Journalists: Study and share new journalism tech

Wired Journalists is a social network for journalists interested in talking about topics like blogging, video, and, well, social networks. They opened their doors to the public on January 22, and almost 2,000 wordy/nerdy types like myself have joined the site since.

I'm a member of: Wired Journalists

Co-founder Ryan Sholin told me this via email:

The key, the mission, the logic behind WJ is the goal of connecting the “wired” with the “not-so-wired-just-yet” to share stories, quell fears, and generally let newbies know that the water’s fine; they can come on in.

It’s built on Ning, a really neat site that makes building a home for an online community very simple.

Communities like this have deep roots in the free and open source software movement. They’re necessary gathering points for folks who are pushing the envelope and building their own tools. It’s great to see journalists getting into the game.

UPDATE: Swapped image in for nasty flash embedding.

Perspective on journalism

I recently started studying journalism after having worked in web design and development for around five years. I was recently asked to give my perspective on journalism after my first 5 months of class.

One thing I’ve discovered through talking to people, including teachers and others in education, is that the Internet is encouraging more people to contribute.

Well, obviously, right?

I think we are just starting to learn how to contribute. People are all writing and reading so much more than they used to. And the youngest generation today is growing up submerged in interactive culture. I grew up watching television, as did my parents. My grandparents grew up listening to the radio. Kids are growing up today with full duplex mass media (it goes both ways). So in the discussion about citizen journalism, I think the citizenry is just beginning to learn the skills to they need to contribute.

I joke that I made a dumb career decision in going from IT to journalism. High pay and low stress to low pay and high stress. Journalism is hard. My goal as a programmer was to get the computer to do my job and make money, even if I’m not around. As a journalist I’ll be trading words for dollars. If I don’t write words, I don’t get dollars.

So I guess the goal here is to figure out how to get the computer to do my new job.

It’s really interesting to be on the creation side of IT. I’ve always been intrigued by content creation software and enjoyed dabbling in it, but it’s great to actually have a good reason and a good idea to make use of all the great tools out there. It’s been an interesting experience to be on both sides.

There are a lot of great tools out there already that make a journalist’s job easier, and this is making journalism more accessible for those who might consider doing it casually.

But like the citizens, the technology still has a way to go.

I can’t imagine reporting before the Internet, and kudos to those that did it. But beyond just information gathering that the web and the Google make so easy, data processing should get better at connecting us with sources. And pointing us in the direction of a good story.

For example, take Public Insight Journalism. I first heard about this at the symposium on Computation + Journalism at Georgia Tech in February. The system was designed and is in use at Minnesota Public Radio, and it could almost be called a contact relationship management system built for journalists. It is a massive network of citizens who can participate by being sources or by submitting story ideas. Twitter is fine, but this is the kind of software we should be building.

And as far as the citizens go, journalism should be taught in high school. And it should be mandatory. It shouldn’t just be considered a special skill, it should be considered basic citizenship.

Ryan Mark is also a programmer, journalist and Medill graduate student. He blogs regularly about digital divide issues at Digital Divisions.

Social production: why it’s important, and how it’s at risk

The Wikipedia, Creative Commons, and free and open source and software are brilliant, wonderful things. They’re examples of forms of collaboration never before possible, and are just a glimmer of what’s to come. But they’re not guaranteed.

Yochai Benkler says it far better than I could:

Social production is a real fact, not a fad. It is the critical long term shift caused by the Internet. Social relations and exchange become significantly more important than they ever were as an economic phenemon.

Yochai Benkler
Click to watch video.

So, next time you open the paper, and you see an intellectual property decision, a telecoms decision – it’s not about something small and technical. It is about the future of the freedom to be as social beings with each other and the way information, knoweldge and culture will be produced.

If you haven’t read Benkler’s book, The Wealth of Networks, I highly recommend you do so. It’s amazing, and freely available online under a creative commons license. (It’s also in print, for paper lovers like me.)

Found on DigiDave.

UPDATE: Swapped image in for nasty flash embedding.