Better online video for news: Short movies = long pictures

Today’s great post from Mindy McAdams reminded me of some thoughts I’ve had recently about online video. News organizations are trying too hard! There’s an easier way to tell video stories on the web.

The web is not TV

Television news has gotten us used to a specific format of video. But a TV piece doesn’t make much sense on the web, especially when you’re accompanying a written story. I don’t need an intro, talking heads, or scrolling text updates online. I’m already reading the story! All I want is the payoff.

Show me the gaffe. The explosion. The kid saying something adorable. I don’t want to see a reporter, or your logo, an ad or anything else. Just the goods. Use video when words fail to capture the moment.

This bit from does it right. News videos are usually a separate piece from the written article, this one is the exception to the rule. (Compare to this other piece from The videos cut to the chase and go straight to her dialogue — they are an interesting accompaniment to the story.

But wouldn’t they be more effective embedded directly into the story, as illustrations? Couldn’t we treat videos like photos in a magazine? Instead of using video as an alternative to reading, use it to punctuate ideas.

Enter the long picture

When Flickr introduced video support earlier this year, their photo-loving users flipped. To calm them down, Flickr suggested that the community thought of them as “long photos.” By limiting the time of a video to 90 seconds, they encouraged brevity and simplicity of production.

& by striatic

Blurry, short, and fan-freakin-tastic

12seconds and Seesmic are already thinking this way, but about conversations. They show us something very important: Video doesn’t need to be perfect to be compelling. Watching John Cleese and a little girl have a conversation is totally great even if the video is brief and grainy.

Re: Ella /: John Cleese on Seesmic Tuesday 7th at NOON Pacific Time
Re: Ella /: John Cleese on Seesmic Tuesday 7th at NOON Pacific TimeThanks John!

You don’t need videographers

I’ve found the sweet spot length of a video is under a minute for sure, and I’ve been quite happy with videos eight to twelve seconds in length. With a video that short, folks don’t really care if the camera shakes or if it’s a little fuzzy. And you don’t need to edit it! Just shoot a bit of video, upload and embed.

And the gear couldn’t be simpler. My $300 Panasonic TZ5 digital camera takes great pictures and shoots *HD video*. Plus it’s got image stabilization and a mother of a zoom lens. Or you can keep it super simple and pick up a Flip – they’re cheap and do a great job. (I shot the video embedded above on my TZ5. For more examples, check out my Long pictures set on Flickr.)

This is simple stuff. You don’t need expensive equipment or a video production team. News organizations are already encouraging their reporters to take photos — why not ask them to shoot a bit of video too? It doesn’t need to be perfect to tell a great story on the web.

Flickr adds embeddable slideshows! Yaaay!

I use Flickr lots. For sharing little videos in my river blog posts, for finding creative-commons-licensed images to accompany my news stories, and for sharing my pictures with the world so that they might find their way into neat places like the Wikipedia.

And now I can embed slideshows! Woo!

Click the little arrows-in-a-box icon for fullscreen.

UPDATE: They also added videos to slide shows. They play automagically. (There are a few videos at the end of this set, if you’d like a demo.)

I love Flickr.

(Thanks to ReadWriteWeb and Mashable for the heads up.)

Video how to: find Creative Commons-licensed images on Flickr

Last week, I posted about finding and using Creative Commons-licensed content. It seemed a bit long, so I thought I’d pack the good bits about Flickr into a video. Check out the earlier post for more about how to attribute an image to an author, and other neat things you can do when you’re down with Creative Commons.

( is totally neat, by the way. It’s got CC licenses built right in!)

UPDATE: Fixed the link to my previous post.

Free, as in free speech, part 2: Free content

Chinese Flowering Crabapple / 海棠(カイドウ), by TANAKA Juuyoh
Chinese Flowering Crabapple / 海棠(カイドウ), by TANAKA Juuyoh

In part 1, I wrote about free speech and free software for journalists. This time we’ll try something a bit easier for the less tech-savvy journo to try out: Creative Commons-licensed content.

Last month I had two stories that were dying for art — one on wetlands, one on flowers. They weren’t half-bad, but without pictures, they weren’t going to get the attention they deserved. What’s a poor journalist to do with no sunflowers to photograph?

Creative Commons to the rescue!

In a few minutes I found two killer images, both free to use, under the simple condition that I attribute the work to the photographers. Neat, eh? The stories were saved, and are on their way to winning Pulitzers.

How to find photos that are free to use

Go to Flickr Advanced Search.

Enter your search terms. (Try to think about how someone would tag their images. They’re usually tagged pretty simply. Don’t search for “big sunflower photo” — search for “sunflower”. Also, folks don’t always use the correct terms. “crabapple” and “crab apple” bring up different result sets, both lovely.)

Flickr search box


Before you press enter, scroll down a bit. At the bottom you’ll see an option to search only within Creative Commons-licensed content. Click the first box. If you will use the image commercially (like in a newspaper, or a web site with ads) then you must click the second box. If you are planning to do something tricky with the image like altering it by adding text or fiddling with contrast or putting it into a video, them you must click the third box.

Creative Commons search boxes at Flickr

Now you can hit search.

And there you have it. Free images. Lovely. But you’re not done just yet.

Once you’ve found an image you like, you need to do your part. The author deserves credit, and if you don’t give it, you’re breaking the license just as badly as if you ripped off a snapshot from National Geographic.

Scroll down on the image page. On the right, under the additional information heading, you’ll see in tiny blue letters the phrase “Some rights reserved.” Click that.

Some rights reserved notice at Flickr

The page the link directs you to is the license for the image. Read this carefully. You’re probably going to have no problems with the terms of the agreement because of those boxes you checked on the search page, but check, just in case. (For instance, if you were to put the image into a video, thus creating a remix, you may be restricted to distribute the derivative work, your video, under a similar license.)

Once you’ve read the terms (which are standard, so once you’ve read a few, you’ll know the agreement at a glance), you’ll need to, at the very least, sort out to whom you’ll attribute the image. At the upper-right corner of the image page is a link to the photographer, click it.

Uploaded by text at Flickr

Then click the link to the photographer’s profile.

Profile navigation at Flickr

here you’ll find the name of the photographer or the handle the photographer uses on Flickr. Either will do for the attribution. I like to use their real name if they choose to list it on their profile.

Now you’ve got all the information you need to attribute the work. So, when you use it, here’s what the Creative Commons FAQ says you’ve got to do:

(1) to keep intact any copyright notices for the Work; (2) credit the author, licensor and/or other parties (such as a wiki or journal) in the manner they specify; (3) the title of the Work; and (4) the Uniform Resource Identifier for the work if specified by the author and/or licensor.

See the pretty picture at the top of this post for an example.

Beyond images

Other types of content can be free to use as well. There are many places you can find Creative Commons-licensed audio, video, text, presentations, and all sorts of other good stuff. Creative Commons Search is a great place to start. I haven’t used it much, but The Freesound Project also looks promising.

I publish this blog under a Creative Commons license. So, for instance, if a teacher found this guide useful and wanted to translate it into her students’ native tongue, she would be able to do so, worry free, as long as the derivative work is not commercially used, and is free to share and remix as well.

Distributed Boing Boing is doing something quite powerful. They make Boing Boing, a hugely popular, and Creative Commons-licensed blog, available to users who cannot access it, because they are blocked from doing so by their government, workplace, etc., by distributing it to lots of other web sites.

Even more

The Library of Congress has a pilot project on Flickr. They’ve posted some great *color* images from the 1930s and 40s, among other stuff. They’re even freer. The Library of Congress images are posted without any restrictions at all, they’re in the public domain.

There is an amazing amount of content out there that’s free to use. And if you use it, I hope you’ll be inspired to give back. I post to Flickr under a Creative Commons license, and as a result, my work has been used by many folks, in ways I never expected.